And then there were three: Comparing top presidential contenders’ energy policies
How Haley, Trump, and Biden compare on energy and climate change
With Ron DeSantis bowing out of the Republican primary, the presidency now essentially comes down to a three-man race. Will the American public take a chance on fresh blood in Nikki Haley, redeem Donald Trump’s controversial reputation, or be willing to forgive record inflation and stick with the status quo under Joe Biden?
It’s been many moons since energy was a top-ticket issue in a presidential race, but with gas prices still well above average and inflation refusing to budge, many voters will be making their decision based on energy. (And even if they’re not, they should be — read on to find out why.)
Here’s what the three top-tier candidates are saying about energy and climate change.
Nikki Haley
Haley’s reputation as a strong leader, skilled negotiator, and unapologetic conservative is well-earned as six-year governor of South Carolina. Haley’s story is the quintessential American story — a daughter of immigrants shattering expectations to become one of the most powerful political leaders in the country. Haley is viewed by many Republicans concerned by Trump’s public image as the safer choice.
Haley played a pivotal role in withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. She has repeatedly expressed support for pro-energy policies, including expanding domestic fossil fuel production, supporting pipelines, and rolling back electric vehicle subsidies. And she is one of few candidates — few people anywhere — exposing the environmental and economic problems with the green movement’s reliance on Chinese batteries and technology.
However, her recent comments in the New Hampshire debate rang alarm bells in the energy sector: “I do think that climate change is real. And I think that it's something that we have to deal with.” Of course the climate changes — millennia of geological data support this, though not the catastrophic climate narrative. But the abruptness of Haley’s comment ceded the moral high ground and has left many wondering what she would consider an acceptable compromise to “deal with” it.
Donald Trump
Trump’s main advantage in the presidential race isn’t his lightning rod status, although controversies certainly keep him in the news cycle and at front of mind for voters. GOP polls overwhelmingly show Trump at the top because of his record in the White House. Even those who would previously have identified as anti-Trumpers are having a hard time resisting a bit of nostalgia looking back on $1.99 gas and their dollars stretching 20% farther.
Trump spent much of his administration undoing bad energy policies put in place by his predecessor, such as cutting taxes and rolling back draconian environmental regulations to save energy producers massive costs. In fact, America’s short-lived energy dominance under Trump’s pro-energy and pro-business stances saved the average household $2,500 a year. Even in today’s dollars, that’s several months’ worth of groceries — a meaningful sum most Americans would be extremely pleased to have back in their bank accounts today.
Meanwhile, the United States continued its upward air quality trajectory uninterrupted — proving that prosperity and environmental quality go hand in hand.
Given Trump’s dominance in Iowa and the polls, it appears that a few mean tweets no longer seem quite so bad if it means Americans can better provide for their families.
Joe Biden
President Biden has made his opinion on Americans’ energy choices abundantly clear — issuing sweeping anti-fossil fuel executive orders his first week in office and all but mandating electric vehicles, whether consumers want them or not.
Biden’s fixation on climate change — which, contrary to the Left’s claims, actually flies in the face of climate science — has consumed every facet of his considerable bureaucracy. Biden has adopted nearly every possible anti-energy policy short of unilaterally banning fossil fuels without apology — from emissions mandates and natural gas taxes to boosting woke ESG investing practices that discriminate against private businesses based on their industry and political stances.
And the American people have suffered for it. It’s not just gas prices. Because the price of energy strongly affects the price of manufacturing and transportation, it affects everything we buy. Energy strongly influences overall cost of living, so every decision Biden has made to restrict American energy producers means more and longer-lasting inflation.
Although Biden has drawn a few opponents for the Democratic nomination, polls suggest the primary will be Biden or bust.
Who will the American people pick?
For the sake of our economy, national security, and overall quality of life, I hope the voters will choose a candidate who will support our responsible American energy producers — the men and women in the oilfields and pipelines working long, hard hours to keep our lives running smoothly. With 10 months left until the general election and many news cycles still to go, anything could happen.
Nikki Haley’s so-called pivotal role in withdrawing the IS from the Paris Peace Accords was strictly and solely because it was the adamant position of the Trump administration to do so.
Ms. Haley is the poster child of a political opportunist (I could use a harsher word but will refrain), and when left to her own devices would sell out her own grandmother for a place at the table.
She is currently sold to the Neocon Liberal’s stable of useful idiots, and freedom of any kind for this nation and its citizens is not a included in their platform, no matter the words that may be mouthed to try to appear as if it is. Just power.